Cannabis businesses can’t file for bankruptcy before federal legalization –

0

To print this article, all you need to do is be registered or log in to Mondaq.com.

Although cannabis use has been legalized in approximately 39 states and the District of Columbia¹, cannabis is still federally illegal and classified as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act. As a result, cannabis companies and cannabis ancillary companies generally do not enjoy the protections provided by the US Bankruptcy Code.

Filing for bankruptcy allows struggling businesses breathing space from creditors to restructure debts and also helps protect against certain litigation and collection efforts. Clifford J. White III, director of the Justice Department’s Executive Office for U.S. Administrators, and John Sheahan, the agency’s general counsel, wrote in a 2017 article published in the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI) Journal²:

Unlike other types of cases involving illegal businesses, in which the criminal activity has already ended and the main concern of the bankruptcy court is to resolve the victims’ competing claims for compensation, a bankruptcy case related to marijuana can involve a company that not only continues in its business, but even seeks positive assistance from the bankruptcy court in order to reorganize its balance sheet and thereby facilitate its violations of the law in the future.

Burton v. Maney (In re Burton)³ involved a husband and wife who filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The bankruptcy petition revealed that the husband and wife held a controlling interest in a company legally engaged in the cultivation and sale of cannabis under the Arizona law, but which had since ceased operations. Based in part on the debtors’ interest in a cannabis-related company, the trustee in bankruptcy moved to dismiss the petition. The debtors argued that their remaining funds were not generated from their operation of the cannabis company, but the company was still a plaintiff in two lawsuits pending in state court in which it sought damages for breach of contract relating to the cultivation and sale of cannabis.

The bankruptcy court concluded that any recovery from the lawsuits would arise from conduct in violation of federal law and that allowing the bankruptcy case to continue would likely require the court and the trustee to administer funds obtained in violation of said law. The bankruptcy court granted the trustee’s motion to dismiss. The Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel upheld, finding that the debtors’ cannabis ownership interests constituted “cause” for termination under section 1307(c) of the Bankruptcy Code.4

There are portions of Burton however, an appeal that may apply for the benefit of cannabis debtors; the appeal committee wrote:

The case law continues to evolve and few clear rules have emerged from the decisions published to date. One principle, however, seems implicit in the case law; the mere presence of marijuana near a bankruptcy filing does not automatically bar a debtor from bankruptcy relief.5

In the same way, In Re Players Network6, concerned a debtor who held a controlling interest in a company that processed cannabis. A creditor sought the dismissal of the debtor’s case under Section 1112(b)(1), arguing in part that the debtor could not propose a plan in good faith based on its equity stake. a cannabis-related company. The bankruptcy court ultimately dismissed the case, in part because of the debtor’s ties to cannabis. Similar to Burtonthe court noted that, at least in the Ninth Circuit, “there does not appear to be a rule per se preventing a Chapter 11 plan from being offered in good faith solely on the basis of the debtor’s relationship to the trade involving marijuana or cannabis products”.seven

Although it appears that the bankruptcy system cannot currently help liquidate or restructure cannabis-related assets, alternatives to bankruptcy are still available to cannabis companies and cannabis ancillary companies. Cannabis entrepreneurs should consult with an attorney to ensure they are structuring their business in a way that allows for the protection of state laws.

Footnotes

1. Approximately 18 states plus the District of Columbia have legalized the recreational or adult use of cannabis.

2. “Why Marijuana Assets Cannot Be Administered in Bankruptcy.” American Institute of BankruptcyDecember 1, 2017, https://www.abi.org/abi-journal/why-marijuana-assets-may-not-be-administered-in-bankruptcy.

3. 610 BR 633 (BAP 9th Cir. 2020).

4. Section 1307(c) provides that “upon application by an interested party or the United States trustee and after notice and hearing, the court may convert a case under this chapter to a case under Chapter 7 of this title, or may dismiss a case under this chapter, as is in the best interests of the creditors and the estate, for cause . . . ” 11 USC § 1307(c) A non-exhaustive list of causal factors is set out in section 1307(c)(1) through (11).

5. In re Burton610 BR to 637 (emphasis added).

6. 2020 Banker LEXIS 3016 [Bankr D Nev Oct. 23, 2020, No.
20-12890-MKN]).

seven. Identifier. at *11, #18.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide on the subject. Specialist advice should be sought regarding your particular situation.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Cannabis and hemp from the United States

CCPA may soon apply to employee and B2B information

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Companies subject to California’s Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) will soon have to figure out how to adapt their privacy programs to include employee and B2B information.

The role of auditing and monitoring in compliance

Ankura Consulting Group LLC

Internal audit and oversight functions are important to an organization’s ability to design and implement an effective compliance program. Although each function has a distinct mandate…

Share.

About Author

Comments are closed.